Pages

Thursday, 10 October 2013

Argumentative essay - accident Dul

            Abdul Qodir Jaelani  who is a 13 years old boy who killed 7 people in a car crashed. He drove a Mitsubishi EVO with his friend on 0045 from Bogor to Jakarta. He drove the car with himself without a driver. He is not responsible to his dad and he just got a car crashed in the toll and crashed to 2 cars and kill 7 people in KM 8. His father known as Ahmad Dahni had charged by the police for responsible for Dul reaction. Our group is disagree to the police that his father is not guilty for what his son reaction.
            First he is lie to his dad that he want to go to see a celebrity with his friend. But he and his friend went to Bogor with his girlfriend and his friend. He drove himself without his driver to the highway and he dismissed his driver to not get overtime. He drove in the highway with the speed 105,8 Km/hour. In the age of 13, in Indonesia the little kid not allowed to drive. Dul have a fake id and fake driving license. He drive in morning with his own car Mitsubishi EVO.
            The second evidence, he got a car crashed and involved 2 cars, Grandmax and Avanza carrying 13 people. He killed 7 people in the car crashed.  His injuries result that he got an broken leg in the right and he got a trauma. The people get injured that was 9 people in the hospital Cibubur.

            In my  conclusion, his father is not blamed for the car crashed but Dul should be blamed for all this action. But I feel his father had no intention to hurt these people and no capability to do so, unlikely son Dul.